Court of Appeals Affirms SEC’s Reg A+, Rejecting States’ Arguments
(This article first appeared on Think Advisor)
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Tuesday shot down attempts by Massachusetts and Montana securities regulators to nullify the Securities and Exchange Commission’s capital raising rule, Regulation A+.
The petitioners, William Galvin and Monica Lindeen, the chief securities regulators for Massachusetts and Montana, respectively, argued that because the SEC “declined to adopt a qualified-purchaser definition limited to investors with sufficient wealth, revenue or financial sophistication to protect their interests without state protection, Regulation A-Plus fails both parts of the United States Supreme Court’s statutory construction standards enunciated in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842–43 (1984).”
FIA IDX panellists discussed institutional interest in crypto assets, regulation and infrastructure.
Connection to China Foreign Exchange Trade System provides enhanced access to onshore bond market.
The Central Securities Depositories Regulation had a mandatory buy-in regime.
The review is an opportunity to recalibrate MiFID II regulations post-Brexit.
Trade associations have asked for an extension of the temporary equivalence decision for UK CCPs.