India Regulator Plans Rules to Slow Down High-Speed Trading
(This article first appeared on Bloomberg)
India’s markets regulator plans to introduce steps to slow down high-frequency trading in the next three months, according to its chairman.
The Securities & Exchange Board of India is considering mandating a fraction-of-a-second speed bump and alternating execution between computer and manual orders, Chairman U. K. Sinha said in an interview at his office in Mumbai. The regulator is also examining a proposal to prevent traders from canceling an algorithmic order until it is confirmed by the bourse, to counter the practice of seeing an order show up momentarily before it’s canceled.
“The worry about misuse or mishap because of HFT and colocation is not over,” Sinha said. “It’s an issue and we haven’t solved it yet.”
Sebi plans to come out with a discussion paper on the proposed changes within a month and could implement final guidelines in three months if no further consultation is needed, Sinha said. Also under consideration is randomizing orders rather than prioritizing them on when they get to the market, and making order-book information public to ensure there’s no preferential treatment, he said.
Sinha’s comments come amid a growing chorus in India calling for Sebi to take action against what they say is high-frequency traders gaining preferential access at the NSE. A report by a SEBI advisory panel recently called for a full investigation into claims of collusion between the exchange and an HFT firm.
Placing orders without any intention to trade is not “a healthy practice” as it is a manipulative strategy that disrupts the markets, Sinha said. In 2012, the watchdog fixed penalties on trading firms that place a large number of orders that don’t result in trades.
SEBI is also planning guidelines on how optical fibers should connect high speed traders to colocation facilities and exchanges and how to distribute and process orders sent to exchange servers, Sinha said, without providing further details.
The regulator has spoken to its international peers, Sinha said, and the consensus was that it should look at data from India’s markets and develop measures on algo trading geared for local needs. “My fellow regulators all over the world have not been able to solve the issue and no one wants to do something disruptive,” he said.
“I don’t want to be the toughest regulator in the world,’’ Sinha said. “We want to be assured that things will be orderly and there are fewer chances of negative surprises and deviant behavior.’’
Firm positions itself as an execution partner for the buy-side trading desk.
TradingScreen notes buy-side quandary of whether to share data with a potential trading rival.
For the moment, the case will move forward.
'Choice is the future of U.S. Treasury trading.'
Does a de facto exchange subsidization for Wall Street giants disadvantage smaller brokers?