06.16.2016

Court of Appeals Affirms SEC’s Reg A+, Rejecting States’ Arguments

06.16.2016

(This article first appeared on Think Advisor)

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Tuesday shot down attempts by Massachusetts and Montana securities regulators to nullify the Securities and Exchange Commission’s capital raising rule, Regulation A+.

The petitioners, William Galvin and Monica Lindeen, the chief securities regulators for Massachusetts and Montana, respectively, argued that because the SEC “declined to adopt a qualified-purchaser definition limited to investors with sufficient wealth, revenue or financial sophistication to protect their interests without state protection, Regulation A-Plus fails both parts of the United States Supreme Court’s statutory construction standards enunciated in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842–43 (1984).”

 

Related articles

  1. Funding and FX requirements will be more complicated for firms operating across time zones.

  2. BIS Warns on Asset Management

    The proposal would undermine the UK's economic competitiveness.

  3. OMS Links Cash and Derivatives Markets

    Availability of adequate resources and tools for CCP resolution remains critical for financial stability.

  4. The SEC would make it impossible to innovate by classifying non-financial platforms as financial applications.

  5. The Australian exchnage is seeking stakeholder feedback by 18 June 2024.