05.13.2019

OPINION: The Sell Side’s Loss Could Be the Exchanges’ Gain

05.13.2019

Alternative trading system operator Liquidnet has purchased independent research aggregator RSRCHXchange in a bid to become “one-stop shop” for research, analysis, and execution for institutional investors.

In a sense, the move makes Liquidnet almost a full-service brokerage, save for the use of its balance sheet to complete client transactions.

How tightly Liquidnet will be able to incorporate the new acquisition into its portfolio of offerings remains to be seen.

Due to MiFID II requirements that went into effect in 2018, Liquidnet will not be able to bundle its research offering with its execution services like it can with its analytics and execution tools, at least for the EU market. It is only a matter of time before the same thing occurs in the US as regulators look to adopt similar regulations in a piecemeal fashion.

The one advantage that Liquidnet has over other broker-dealers is that it won’t have to go through the research-pricing exercise that other sell-side firm with original research went through in the past couple of years. RSRCHXchange already figured it out when it launched in 2015.

It might be the success of Liquidnet’s branding that has many people think of it as a liquidity venue first and an agency brokerage second, but shouldn’t exchange operators start moving into the research aggregation business as well?

Exchanges already have dipped their toes into aggregating alternative data content like Nasdaq Analytics Hub, which the exchange operator launched in 2017.

How difficult would it be to offer independent research as well?

Exchanges could encounter additional grief from their sell-side clients for disintermediating them from their buy-side customers, but the would that add any further ire given the sell side’s existing anger regarding market data and access fees?

It’s doubtful. Sell-side research always has been a value add bundled with execution services to cover a multitude of billing sins between brokers and their institutional clients.

Theoretically, the brokers already are competing with the independent analysis firms authoring research. Exchanges only would be providing the firms with an additional distribution channel.

The easiest way to see if this idea has traction is to keep an eye on the remaining independent research aggregators like SmartKarma and see if an exchange snaps it up.

A recent Markets Media article highlights how @tZERO is resetting its vision - focusing on partnerships, regulated infrastructure, and global scale to make tokenized capital markets a reality.

Under CEO @Alan_Konevsky, the company is leveraging regulatory momentum to enable…

Want to know who calls the shots on trading tech? We partnered with @WeAreAdaptive to interview capital markets professionals globally to uncover key trends and evolving patterns in technology deployment. Reach the report here:

Load More

Related articles

  1. This year marks the flagship report's 30th anniversary.

  2. Most research budgets will become client-funded within the next two years.

  3. It offers a tailor-made service to clients subscribing to the bank’s market research. 

  4. Research Industry Prepares For Unbundling

    Half of firms want a relaxation of the fund level budgeting proposals.

  5. Buy Side Responds to Esma on Clearing Swaps

    The code sets out standards of independence and objectivity for research providers.

We're Enhancing Your Experience with Smart Technology

We've updated our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy to introduce AI tools that will personalize your content, improve our market analysis, and deliver more relevant insights.These changes take effect on Aug 25, 2025.
Your data remains protected—we're simply using smart technology to serve you better. [Review Full Terms] | [Review Privacy Policy] Please review our updated Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy carefully. By continuing to use our services after Aug 25, 2025, you agree to these

Close the CTA