Active Funds Underperformed Passive During Market Stress03.29.2022
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulator, is publishing the outcome of a study analysing the performance of actively managed equity UCITS relative to their prospectus and market benchmark indices, between 19 February 2020 and the end of June 2020.
Actively managed funds did not consistently outperform passive between Feb. and Jun. 2020 → https://t.co/Qklp9uKZhw.
— ESMA – EU Securities Markets Regulator 🇪🇺 (@ESMAComms) March 28, 2022
The results shed light on equity fund performance by type of management, especially during a period of stress such as the first wave of COVID-19. ESMA concludes that actively managed funds did not consistently outperform passive during this period.
The strong market downturn at the beginning of the period followed by a fast recovery and then stabilisation offered a real-life opportunity to test the accepted hypothesis that active equity UCITS outperform their benchmarks during stressed market conditions.
The main findings show that the sample of funds considered active funds, net of ongoing costs, did not on average outperform their related benchmarks.
More than half of the active UCITS analysed underperformed their benchmarks during the stressed period (between 19 February and 31 March) and more than 40% during the post-stress period (between 1 April and 30 June). Only funds belonging to the highest-rated class consistently outperformed the benchmarks. For the rest of the funds analysed, benchmark-adjusted performance hovered around zero or was clearly negative.
Funds and advisers that market themselves as having an ESG focus would have required disclosures.
Concerns about greenwashing continue said American Century Investments.
Direct clearing offers more efficient management of cash and securities collateral.
European asset managers have upcoming compliance and regulatory disclosure obligations under SFDR.
ESG funds remain statistically cheaper and better performing than non-ESG peers.