U.S. Managers Eye Unbundling
MiFID II’s research unbundling requirement is having a noticeable effect on the other side of the Atlantic as many US asset managers look to purchase broker research directly instead of through commissions.
“Some of this comes from global managers that are adopting a uniform approach across their organizations,” said Mike Stepanovich, CEO of Visible Alpha’s ONEaccess broker-valuation business line. “But some of this are people adopting it as best practices in regards to how they are going to manage their broker relationship going forward.”
Although Tier-2 and Tier-3 US-based asset managers do not have to comply with MiFID II, they can leverage portions of the directive as best practices, he added.
“It is sensible enough for me to collect my interactions with my brokers, normalize them, and then use the results in my broker vote,” he said. “That is just a sensible way of running your broker-valuation. I think that it is emerging as a best practice.”
US-based asset managers that look to adopt de-linking broker research from broker commissions also can benefit from lessons learned from European asset managers as their counterparts must have their processes and procedures in place to meet MiFID II’s January 2018 deadline.
“There is no doubt that the intensity of the work we see in Europe is stronger than we see in North America,” he said.
At the end of 2016, Stepanovich noticed many asset managers researching which tools and platforms were available to help the firms make their procedures MiFID II compliant.
“I think people are looking to make a decision this quarter or in the next one because they want to have their implementations completed by mid-year if possible and then use the second half of the year to really to be testing, checking things out, and making sure that things work properly,” he added.
Regulatory reporting is an important part of MiFID II.
Notional outstanding in interest rate swaps grew 26%.
A briefing paper supports alignment of the clearing obligation under the EMIR and MiFID II.
UK divergences from EU in its wholesale market review.
AFME said MiFIR review should prioritise improvements in regulatory data definitions and collection.