EFAMA, the voice of the European investment management industry, joins the French and Dutch financial market authoritie​s’ call for a European regulation of ESG data, research and ratings.

European asset managers are observing a double-digit growth in the demand for ESG investments, and clients are increasingly sophisticated in their preferences*.

Giorgio Botta, EFAMA Regulatory Policy Advisor, commented: “Asset managers wish to encourage this ESG investment trend by expanding their offering of sustainable products and by providing investors with trustworthy and comparable information – also in response to EU regulation introduced to fight greenwashing and enhance transparency. To fulfil these objectives, investors need solid and reliable data. Given the lack of publicly available information, asset managers are heavily reliant on the information from third-party providers of ESG data, research and ratings, which comes with high costs and many questions.”

EFAMA joins the French and Dutch financial market authoritie​s’ call for a European regulation of ESG data, research and ratings.

>>>https://t.co/5T9XFDKl3u#EFAMA #assetmanagement #ESGdata #AFM #AMF pic.twitter.com/MLnwVsXEVD

— EFAMA (@EFAMANews) December 18, 2020

• ​Market concentration and costs: EFAMA members observe an increasing concentration in the market for ESG information, partly driven by merger activity, and rising ESG data costs. This spike in the cost of ESG data is particularly detrimental to smaller firms which have less resources and bargaining power, and to end-investors who ultimately foot the bill.
• Comparability and reliability: third-party ESG data and research are often inconsistent, and ratings may vary considerably among providers. This limits the reliability, comparability and usefulness of the information provided and expose investors to the risk of greenwashing. 
• Transparency on methodologies: The methodologies used by third-party providers to gather and process data lack transparency. More transparency would enable asset managers to ascertain that the information provided can be safely relied on in the context of their investment and product development strategies.
• Potential conflicts of interest: the offering of a broad range of products and services by third-party providers, combined with high market concentration, raises conflict of interest concerns. To preserve market integrity, rules aimed at identifying and managing potential conflicts of interest are needed.
• Dialogue with rated companies: to improve the quality of research and ratings, and avoid factually incorrect analyses and misleading or incorrect conclusions, third-party providers should step up their dialogue with rated companies. This would help them produce research and ratings that better capture the context in which companies operate.