03.30.2021

ESMA Fines Moody’s For Conflicts Of Interest

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulator, has fined five entities in the Moody’s Group, based in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom, a total of €3,703,000 and issued public notices for breaches of the Credit Ratings Agencies Regulation (CRAR) regarding independence and the avoidance of shareholder conflicts of interest.

The breaches related to:

  1. the issuance of credit ratings (ratings) in violation of the ban on issuing new ratings on entities where a credit rating agency (CRA) shareholder exceeds the 10% ownership threshold and/or is a board member of the rated entity;
  2. failure to disclose conflicts of interests related to the 5% ownership threshold; and
  3. inadequate internal policies and procedures to manage shareholder conflicts of interest.

All the breaches were found to have resulted from negligence on the part of Moody’s.

The five entities subject to the action are Moody’s Investors Service Ltd (Moody’s UK), Moody’s France S.A.S. (Moody’s France), Moody’s Deutschland GmbH (Moody’s Germany), Moody’s Italia S.r.l. (Moody’s Italy), and Moody’s Investors Service España S.A. (Moody’s Spain).

ESMA believes it is crucial, to ensure independent good quality ratings and to protect investors, that CRAs carefully identify, and subsequently eliminate or manage and disclose conflicts of interest to avoid interference by shareholders with the rating process.

Breaches of the Credit Rating Regulation

The infringements committed by Moody’s UK, for which it was fined €2,735,000, were:

  • issuing new ratings in violation of the ban related to the 10% ownership threshold, in particular the prohibition to issue a new rating where a shareholder holding 10% or more of the capital or voting rights of the CRA also holds 10% or more of the capital or voting rights or is a member of the administrative or supervisory board of the rated entity;
  • the lack of appropriate disclosure regarding shareholder conflicts of interests which occurred in 206 instances for 65 rated entities. Regarding the requirement to publicly disclose where an existing rating is potentially affected by a situation where a shareholder of a CRA holding 5% or more of the capital or voting rights of the CRA also holds 5% or more of the capital or voting rights, or is a member of the administrative or supervisory board of the rated entity;
  • a lack of adequate policies and procedures. It was found that although Moody’s Procedure on Shareholding, aimed at avoiding the conflicts of interests, contained the legal ban to issue new ratings related to the 10% threshold, it also included an incorrect exception to the ban;
  • a lack of appropriate and effective organisational and administrative arrangements, with significant shortcomings in the data source used to identify conflicts; and
  • a lack of sound administrative, accounting procedures and internal control mechanisms.

The Moody’s entities in France, Germany, Italy and Spain each committed the following infringement:

  • lack of appropriate disclosure regarding shareholder conflicts of interests, which occurred in 72 instances for 36 rated entities. Regarding the requirement to publicly disclose where an existing rating is potentially affected by a situation where a shareholder of a CRA holding 5% or more of the capital or voting rights of the CRA, holds 5 % or more of the capital or voting rights or is a member of the administrative or supervisory board of the rated entity.

They were each fined the following amounts:

  • Moody’s France – €280,000;
  • Moody’s Germany – €340,000; and
  • Moody’s Italy and Moody’s Spain – €174,000 each.

Source: ESMA

Related articles

  1. RBC Capital Markets paid more than $800,000 to resolve charges that it engaged in unfair dealing in munis.

  2. Electronification of the municipal bond market also presents a large opportunity.

  3. Aberdeen AM Looks to Grow In China

    The success of Northbound trading showed electronic execution is way forward for the bond market.

  4. Margins Raised Ahead of Brexit Vote

    IRS trading volumes have fragmented without an equivalence agreement.

  5. Increased electronification has created useable and accessible real-time and historic trade data.