Exchanges Win on Market-Data Ruling
And it is the exchanges that prevail in the market data pricing and competition debate.
In a recent judgement and decision from Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Judge Brenda Murray, she ratified a June 2016 decision that exchanges’ market data businesses are subject to competitive forces. Her decision, reported first by S&P Global Intelligence, effectively could bring to a close the nearly two-year battle between the brokers and the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq regarding pricing of data.
The case, first brought by the Securities Industry Financial Management Association (SIFMA) argued broker/dealers were being charged unreasonable prices for the exchanges’ market data feeds. The argument was rooted in the fact that since the different feeds offered by the exchanges cover different data sets and all feed data is necessary for brokers to route order in compliance with best ex mandates, feed prices were unconstrained by competition.
However, in June 2016, Judge Murray ruled in favor of the exchanges, writing that their depth-of-book prices are constrained by a client’s ability to switch to another exchange’s product. Soon after the ruling, the SEC granted SIFMA an appeal to the decision, but when Murray requested any new evidence from SIFMA, Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange in December 2017, the three parties declined to do so.
And that is as they say, is that. Case ended.
S&P reported that SIFMA, NYSE and Nasdaq all declined to comment on the matter.
There is a need for institutional-grade liquidity in the digital asset market.
Since the start of 2022 liquidity has shifted to SOFR-based derivatives at an accelerated pace.
LSEG's derivatives venue is closing on 28 January after more than five years of operations.
The regulator said it is considering modernizing its rules related to the definition of an exchange.
The regulator may also modernize rules related to the definition of an exchange.