Flashback Friday: NYSE Roils Options
It was a time of acquisition mania in the options mart back in 2005 as the NYSE has just purchased rival Arca Ex, which in turn had itself just acquired the Pacific Coast Exchange. The grab for market share in these equity derivatives was the key to profitability, the thinking went.
But what about competition and the NYSE having an unfair advantage? Compared to today’s trend of increased fragmentation in options, the idea of monopoly or oligopoly seems ludicrous.
In a recent blog from FlexTrade, the firm wrote that some experts are debating whether the complexity of the listed U.S. options market structure is hurting liquidity providers and driving some market makers out of the business.
Sluggish trading volumes have become a concern recently. Year-to-date, average daily options volume in exchange-listed equity options is down 2.3 % from 2016 with 16. 4 million contracts, according to Options Clearing Corp. In April, total equity options contract volume fell by 10.3% to 269.6 million from 300.6 million the prior year. At the same time, ETF options volume rose 3.53% and index options volume surged 28.4% in April over the prior year.
“The US options market currently has 15 lit exchanges, four flash mechanisms, eight different auctions, seven complex order books or a total of 37 places to source liquidity,” said Jason Lichten, director, equity and listed derivatives trading strategies, Wolverine Execution Services, who recently spoke on a call hosted by the Security Traders Association.
The state of the options market structure has become a controversial topic. “It’s a pretty tangled web that we’ve woven for ourselves here,” said Lichten, who spoke about institutional trading in options and bringing transparency in a complex market.
Last year, MIAX Pearl made its debut raising the number to 15. Experts are expecting one more exchange to launch in 2017, bringing the total up to 16 exchanges, which will further bifurcate the landscape for liquidity.
Each exchange is betting that competing market structures can co-exist under the same roof, appealing to distinct customer segments. However, each exchange has a similar model, whether pro-rata or price/time priority, said WEX’s Lichten. Options exchanges have also adopted make-take, in which a trader is paid a rebate for posting a limit order, or charged a fee for removing liquidity. Another model in reverse is taker-maker in which a trader is paid a rebate for removing liquidity because this attracts high-speed traders who are charged a fee per contract for posting liquidity.
So, where does this leave traders? More options exchanges and more choices?
One thing is certain, there are now currently four major exchange families – CBOE/BATS, Nasdaq/ISE, NYSE (Arca, Amex), and MIAX Options Exchange. And each one runs multiple venues that span different methods of execution, such as price-time priority, or pro rata, customer priority, and fee schedules including maker taker and taker maker. And despite the consolidation that has occurred, there is still the same number of exchanges.
The following article originally appeared in June 2005
As expected, the talk of the town at the 23rd annual Options Industry Conference in Bonita Springs, Fla., was the purchase of Arca-Ex by the NYSE.
Arca-Ex had just set the options world on fire a few months ago when it purchased the Pacific Coast Exchange (PCX). The ink on the Arca/ PCX deal was still wet when the NYSE announced its intention to gobble up the combined Arca-Ex entity.
This purchase has unleashed yet another round of speculation about the future of the options industry. Some believe that the combined market power of Arca-Ex, NYSE and the PCX will throw off the delicate competitive balance of he options markets.
“The question remains whether this merger provides a disincentive to competition in the industry,” says Bill Brodsky, Chairman & CEO of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE).
However, others believe that this merger has more to do with competition in the equities markets than in the options markets.
“I don’t think the driver of the merger was options,” says Ken Leibler, CEO of the Boston Options Exchange (BOX). “I think the real driver was access to electronic equity trading. Options were just an interesting side benefit.”
The truth is unlikely to be revealed anytime soon as the deal still has to pass muster with members and regulators. In the meantime, speculation and rumormongering will continue in the options world.
Options can offer higher yields in current high volatility market.
Emerald will fill a market niche not addressed by the company’s other two exchanges.
Designation mandates order entered via price improvement period.
Plantiff says patents filed between 2003 and 2013 are invalid.
C2 Options Exchange will make its move in May.