FRTB has Higher Capital Charges for Carbon Trading


The Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) includes higher capital charges for carbon trading under the standardized approach to market risk, which has implications for banks in their role as intermediaries in the emissions trading system (ETS).

In an earlier paper, ISDA investigated whether the regulatory treatment of carbon credit trading under the FRTB is justified by focusing on the EU ETS. The appropriate treatment is important as overly stringent capital requirements would impair the functioning of the carbon market and hamper the willingness of firms to invest in the transformation to a green economy.

This paper extends the findings by investigating the risk of carbon certificate trading in two North American markets – the Western Climate Initiative and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative – as well as the UK’s ETS.

Documents (1)for Implications of the FRTB for Carbon Certificates: A Global Perspective

Source: ISDA

Related articles

  1. The electronic broker collaborated with Sustain.Life for emissions data.

  2. The venue promotes interoperability between crypto and carbon markets.

  3. The meeting will discuss supply and demand for high quality carbon offsets, product standardization and data.

  4. The exchange hopes to list carbon funds later this year.

  5. Last year voluntary carbon markets traded more than $1bn in notional value for the first time.