FSB Sets Out Framework To Monitor Crypto-Assets07.16.2018
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) today published a report delivered to the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors on the work of the FSB and standard-setting bodies on crypto-assets.
FSB report sets out framework to monitor crypto-asset markets including new monitoring framework and actions being taken by international standard-setters @BIS_org @IOSCOPress #cryptoassets https://t.co/9i34oSkttI pic.twitter.com/ZUhxzWqrMP
— The FSB (@FinStbBoard) July 16, 2018
For its part, the FSB has developed a framework, in collaboration with Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI), to monitor the financial stability implications of developments in crypto-asset markets. The report published today sets out the metrics that the FSB will use to monitor crypto-asset markets as part of its ongoing assessment of vulnerabilities in the financial system.
While the FSB believes that crypto-assets do not pose a material risk to global financial stability at this time, it recognises the need for vigilant monitoring in light of the speed of market developments. The monitoring framework focuses on the transmission channels from crypto-asset markets that may give rise to financial stability risks. Monitoring the size and growth of crypto-asset markets is critical to understanding the potential size of wealth effects, should valuations fall. The use of leverage, and financial institution exposures to crypto-asset markets are important metrics of transmission of crypto-asset risks to the broader financial system. The framework also includes metrics on trading volumes, pricing, clearing and margining for crypto-asset derivatives. Metrics on exposures will become part of the framework to the extent that they become available.
FSB Chair Mark Carney in his letter to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in March noted that crypto-assets raise a host of issues around consumer and investor protection, as well as their use to shield illicit activity and for money laundering and terrorist financing. At the same time, the technologies underlying them have the potential to improve the efficiency and inclusiveness of both the financial system and the economy.
Against this backdrop, the report published also describes the substantial work standard-setting bodies are undertaking in the areas of their respective mandates:
CPMI has conducted significant work on applications of distributed ledger technology, and is conducting outreach, monitoring, and analysis of payment innovations.
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has established an initial coin offering (ICO) Consultation Network to discuss experiences and concerns regarding ICOs, and is developing a Support Framework to assist members in considering how to address domestic and cross-border issues stemming from ICOs that could impact investor protection. IOSCO is also discussing other issues around crypto-assets, including, for example, regulatory issues around crypto-assets platforms.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is assessing the materiality of banks’ direct and indirect exposures to crypto-assets, clarifying the prudential treatment of such exposures, and monitoring developments related to crypto-assets for banks and supervisors.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) will report separately to the G20 on its work concerning the money laundering and terrorist financing risks relating to crypto-assets.
Virginie O’Shea, research director at consultancy Aite Group, said:
FSB is cautioning against a snap decision about launching central bank digital currencies as "an entry into uncharted territory" and for these entities to "proceed with caution". #cryptocurrency https://t.co/KuRREgr4FP
— Virginie O'Shea (@virginieoshea) July 16, 2018
New York State Department of Financial Services has been regulating virtual currency companies since 2015.
The chairman of the CFTC testified before a Senate committee.
Can the industry move from speculation to utility?
EMEA is leading the way in creating a safe and secure regulatory environment for crypto.
The bipartisan Lummis-Gillibrand bill requires segregation of customer assets and unbundling of custody.