Increased Regulatory Oversight of U.S. Treasury Market May Cause More Harm Than Good: TABB Group Research09.27.2016
Tabb Group – NEW YORK & LONDON – Following the extreme market volatility experienced in October 2014, the regulatory agencies that oversee the U.S. Treasury market began efforts to examine market structure and determine whether increased regulation is required. TABB Group’s latest research, “U.S. Treasury Market 2016: Bamboo Market Structure,” indicates that the market is fundamentally sound and injecting an external catalyst, such as increased regulation in the form of execution or transparency mandates, may actually upend the delicate balance that has evolved and maintained efficiency in the treasury markets.
Anthony Perrotta, report author and head of research and consulting at TABB, interviewed a cross section of market participants to gain a better understanding of market infrastructure and trading behavior, discovering a bifurcated market that is uniquely adapted to dealing with the demands of being the world’s benchmark market. The research assesses the Joint Staff Report released in July 2015 on the initial findings on the market’s current structure, as well as the catalysts spurring change, and examines whether shifts in liquidity truly are causing the market to become unhinged.
According to TABB, the U.S. Treasury market serves as a benchmark for a variety of financial markets and remains a proxy for the risk-free rate for many institutional and retail investors. When certain events such as geopolitical turmoil, natural disasters or market volatility are present, the market is considered to be a safe haven for investment funds around the world. Despite this information, federal regulators have put the marketplace under review with many calling for greater transparency and centralized clearing.
Liquidity is a highly scrutinized issue for the marketplace and though TABB’s research believes changes at Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) and capital adequacy requirements are the primary drivers of any liquidity shifts underway, the Joint Staff Report seemingly ignored the impact in their analysis of the unique liquidity circumstances on price movement on the day in question in October 2014. TABB also details why the narrative that liquidity in the U.S. Treasury market is waning and that banks are no longer providing liquidity is overly misleading. In fact, TABB finds investors continue to source most, if not all, of their liquidity directly from banks.
“The majority of the firms we have spoken with believe the U.S. Treasury market is extraordinarily efficient and while the liquidity landscape is shifting, it has been doing so over the last decade,” says Perrotta. “Market structure is changing organically and while the U.S. Treasury market has been bending to meet the needs of participants, it rarely breaks while adapting to these shifting sands. The mechanisms, protocols and relationships utilized to move capital throughout the system work in an orchestral harmony and as such we find little evidence to support the belief that this market requires any wholesale regulatory or structural changes.”
The research is now available for download by TABB’s Research Alliance fixed income clients at https://research.tabbgroup.com/search/grid. For more information or to purchase the reports, contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Analysts can focus on adding value rather than on rote data logistics.
This will bolster KKR’s capacity to serve as a full-service underwriter for IPOs.
A select group of bulge-bracket brokers have gained market share.
They will co-operate on fixed income, currencies and commodities academic research.
Covid, ESG and a growing focus on data has significantly churned market share.