02.15.2024

SIFMA Supports Litigation of CAT Funding Model

02.15.2024
SIFMA Supports Litigation of CAT Funding Model

In an amicus brief, SIFMA outlines its support of the litigation brought by the American Securities Association and Citadel against the SEC for the approval of the CAT NMS Plan funding model.

The brief, which was filed by SIFMA, the Alternative Management Association, the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation, the Investment Company Institute, the Managed Funds Association, and Virtu Financial, raises the following points:

  • The SEC’s order is invalid because it inequitably and unjustifiably imposes massive costs on broker-dealers and investors while affording them no genuine role in establishing the CAT’s budget.
    • The Commission failed to address the effect of the CAT’s structure on CAT costs.
    • The Commission failed to adequately consider alternative cost-control mechanisms.
  • The allocation of more than two-thirds and potentially 100% of CAT costs to broker-dealers is contrary to law and arbitrary and capricious.
    • The Commission’s allocation of costs is inequitable and unreasonable.
    • The Commission failed adequately to consider the effect of participants passing through their share of costs.

SIFMA president and CEO Kenneth E. Bentsen, Jr., said: “The CAT funding model approved by the SEC is deeply flawed and we support the litigation challenging it for several reasons.

First, as explained in our June 2023 comment letter, the funding model provides for inequitable allocation of CAT costs between industry member broker-dealers and the SROs. Taking into account industry member funding of FINRA, the model assigns over 80% of CAT costs to industry member broker-dealers.

Second, as outlined in our May 2023 comment letter, we strongly disagree with the SROs determination of which industry member broker-dealer will be assessed CAT fees.  We believe the most reasonable way to allocate CAT costs among industry members is to make the industry member that originated the ultimately executed order the one responsible for CAT fees.

And third, as noted in our July 2023 comment letter, rising CAT costs, which currently have no legal limit or mechanism for control that is being implemented, need to be addressed.

“When fully implemented, the CAT will be the largest database of retail and institutional trading data ever created.  It also will include personal information on every retail brokerage customer in America, as well as identifying information for every pension fund, mutual fund, and other institutional account in America. For years SIFMA has pointed out time and again the need to address fundamental issues with the CAT, weighing in on the security of investors’ personal data, liability and funding, among other topics.  It is essential to get this right.”

Source: SIFMA

 

It's been a month since we had our Women In Finance Awards in New York City at the Plaza! Take a look back tab some moments, and nominate for our upcoming awards in Mexico City and Singapore here: https://www.marketsmedia.com/category/events/

4

Citadel Securities told the SEC that trading tokenized equities should remain under existing market rules, a position that drew responses from various crypto industry groups. @ShannyBasar for @MarketsMedia:

SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda argued that private assets belong in retirement plans, saying diversified alts can improve risk-adjusted returns and that the answer to optimal exposure “is not zero.” @ShannyBasar reporting for @MarketsMedia:

COO of the Year Award winner! 🏆
Discover how Jennifer Kaiser of Marex earned the 2025 Women in Finance COO of the Year recognition.

Load More

Related articles

  1. Once ordered by the court, there will be a path to signing a contract with Etrading Software.

  2. The UK regulator could sign a contract with Etrading Software If the High Court lifts a suspension.

  3. No fundamental barriers were identified across legal, operational and regulatory dimensions.

  4. The decision significantly reduces uncertainty and the potential for market disruption.

  5. Any professional investor or investment fund could potentially be considered a dealer.