Too Much, Too Late?
In attempting to address longstanding issues around equity market data costs, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission may have bitten off more than it can comfortably digest before the regulatorâ€™s current leadership has to leave the table.
Observers suggest reform proposals could prove too unwieldy to make meaningful progress ahead of a changing of the guard, heralded either by Novemberâ€™s presidential election or the end of SEC Chairman Jay Claytonâ€™s tenure next year.
The challenge stems largely from the Commissionâ€™s willingness to take on multiple complex and contentious issues so late in its lifecycle. In short, it proposes to enhance public market data feeds provided by the Securities Information Processor, the industry data utility, by introducing competition, expanding content and overhauling governance.
To serve institutional clients effectively, intermediaries have been compelled to supplement core national best bid and offer (NBBO) data for Nasdaq and NYSE-listed stocks from the SIP with faster, more granular and expensive proprietary feeds from exchanges. But reviving the relevance of SIP data after years of neglect is no picnic.
According to a snap poll of market participants conducted by Rosenblatt Securities, the SECâ€™s SIP governance order has stronger backing (59%) than the infrastructure proposal issued in February (48%). But Rosenblatt Managing Director Justin Schack says the extent of the SIP governance changes may not be widely appreciated. â€śIt isnâ€™t just giving new players a voice. By diluting the big exchangesâ€™ voting power â€“ giving votes both to non-exchanges and new exchanges controlled by big banks and brokers â€“ the order effectively transfers majority control,â€ť he explained.
Several aspects of the infrastructure proposals are sparking controversy. The decision to include odd lots and sub-100-share round lots in the expanded SIP universe without extending protection from trade-throughs â€“ partially repealing Regulation NMSâ€™s Order Protection Rule â€“ has concerned many. Only a fifth of respondents to Rosenblattâ€™s poll back the proposal and almost half (46%) say any changes to OPR should be handled separately.
Schack acknowledges the tight schedule the SEC has set itself. â€śTime may be running out to implement the Commissionâ€™s agenda. I would not be surprised to see a strong effort to get these proposals in place sooner rather than later. But itâ€™s also possible the major exchanges could turn to the courts to block some aspects of SIP reform, as theyâ€™ve successfully done with the SECâ€™s Transaction Fee Pilot and other proposed market-data reforms,â€ť he observed.
Exchange consultation responses suggest they are keen to defend their proprietary feed revenues, but itâ€™s not clear the current proposals would draw users back to SIP data. The SEC envisages 12 competing consolidators of SIP data, but the framework for providers and users fall short.
â€śAs it stands, the SEC proposal solidifies the advantage of the exchangesâ€™ proprietary feeds over SIPs, by explicitly allowing a latency advantage to the former,â€ť says Tyler Gellasch, executive director at the Healthy Markets Association. â€śAnd by failing to set minimum data quality standards for competing SIPs from new providers, there is an increased risk of investor harm, for example if a broker deliberately choses an inferior feed when benchmarking executions for investors.â€ť
Patrick Flannery, CEO of market data solutions provider MayStreet, says his firm is well-positioned to be a competing consolidator, but he remains cautious. â€śThere is a question over whether it can become a final ruling, given weâ€™re in an election year. The SEC may feel getting something done is better than getting nothing done, though an imperfect ruling might not go far enough to really allow true competition,â€ť he said.
Xignite founder Stephane Dubois has ruled his market data firm out and says others will be put off by legal and regulatory costs. â€śThis therefore reduces the value of opening the SIP to competitors significantly.â€ť
The SEC proposals frequently run up against well-known problems unaddressed since Reg NMS mapped out the current market structure in 2005.
Adam Inzirillo, head of US equities at Cboe Global Markets, says failure to extend the OPR creates a distinction between the NBBO and a protected best bid and offer for quotes of 100 shares or more. â€śThe proposal effectively creates a two-tier market, but with no guidance on when to use the NBBO or the PBBO to achieve best execution for clients,â€ť he said.
Inzirillo recommends a focus on eliminating geographic latency via a distributed SIP model and enhancing content. Even these first steps would take 12-18 months for the industry to implement and reassess the case for SIPs vs proprietary feeds, he says, leaving regulators time to develop updated guidance on delivering best execution.
By focusing on geographic latency, Cboe is flagging a long-debated bone of contention among market operators and participants. This also applies to the groupâ€™s calls for reforms to boost exchangesâ€™ ability to compete for order flow, around tick sizes and sub-penny pricing.
As Gellasch observes, a regulatory failure to act in the past is causing indigestion in the present.
â€śThe SEC has sat by for decades letting exchanges charge ever-increasing fees for market data, then use those revenues to subsidise trading. Exchanges are now dependent on that model to compete for order flow, and both parts â€“ the data and the trading fees â€“ give rise to significant market distortions, and discriminate against smaller traders.â€ť
â€śThe question is whether the SEC has the political will to challenge exchangesâ€™ data revenues and the wherewithal to withstand the pushback from exchanges when it comes.â€ť
Chris Hall is a Senior Correspondent for Traders Magazine, a Markets Media Group publication. Chris can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
Canadian Depositary Receipts provide investors with access to foreign stocks with mitigated currency risk.
The exchange has launched new fixed income, thematic and ESG-focused indices.
The addressable market for private company secondary transactions is up to $1.5bn.
US institutions can access all European and Asian markets with one contractual relationship.
SVP, Citi, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley will invest in the new company.