07.01.2019

MAR Turns 3, But Banks Are Still Lost in Communication

By Juan Diego Martin, COO Fonetic

It’s been three years since the Markets Abuse Regulation (MAR) came into force, with the aim to protect investors and increase market integrity. The regulation was certainly ambitious, extending previous market abuse rules to cover any conduct or action that can have an effect on a financial instrument, whether it takes place on a trading venue or not.

Financial institutions haven’t taken this lightly. In fact, figures show that banks spent $737m developing and enhancing their surveillance capability over the last two years.

However, this has done little to stem the number of market abuse-related fines we’ve seen in recent months. One need only read into the fines to see where the issue lies. Almost every description boils down to a deficiency in one key area – communications surveillance.

While significant investment has gone into detecting market abuse in financial institutions, this investment has primarily focused on trade, rather than communications surveillance. Given that 19 of the 26 identified behaviours identified under MAR require the corresponding communications to an order to identify any suspicious activity, this approach clearly doesn’t cut the mustard. As a result, most financial institutions under the watchful eyes of the regulator are likely to be woefully unequipped.

Given the number of recent fines we’ve seen for institutions in violation of MAR, its clear that any kind of regulatory grace period for institutions to put systems in place is long gone. In fact, in some cases regulators have actually started manually looking through communications in order to sift out any suspicious behaviour. As the regulators start to close in, institutions need to adapt in order to keep pace.

This doesn’t mean there is a need to panic. Where previously voice surveillance was seen as a ‘problem child’, which was too complex for the technology to get right, financial institutions are starting to realise that there is surveillance software available which can monitor voice channels or other communications and link them, automatically, to their related trades, all together in one system. The new technology can not only identify when misconduct has happened, but has also developed to track malicious intent in trader communications, potentially stopping the crime before it has even been committed, or at least had time to cause significant reputations damage to the firm.

Banks who can get this combination of trade and communications surveillance right will be able to identify any malicious behaviour well ahead of time, so they can rest easy when the regulator comes to call.

Related articles

  1. Summer Trading Network 2016

    Most innovative business models can operate within the existing EU rules.

  2. FSB highlights trade reporting problems

    The regulator said the trade repository negligently failed to provide access to derivatives data.

  3. Connecting to SEFs: An Industry Problem

    Post-trade tape for equities could be close at hand.

  4. Basel Committee Consults on Interest-Rate Risk

    Regulators want to ensure a smooth transition to reformed benchmark rates.

  5. Meritsoft says U.S. firms should prepare for a landscape resembling Europe’s.